prodos

Members
  • Content count

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About prodos

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • ICQ 0
  1. Good morning from Melbourne, Australia! Thanks.
  2. Greetings from the USA! I've now completed my analysis of the issues Mikko Ellilä presented in his article, Society Consists of People. Here it is: Are Blacks genetically LOWER in intelligence and HIGHER in psychopathy than Whites? I've spent about 100 hours researching and writing this article. It's been very interesting and there's a lot more I want to understand, but I now feel I've grasped enough to make a judgement on the matter that is fair and is also seen to be fair (in the context of my position as owner of the Thinker To Thinker blog service) I'll now give Mikko a chance to respond before deciding on appropriate action. PS: I'll do my best over the next couple of days to read all the posts on THE FORUM which have discussed this matter. Thanks.
  3. Good morning from the USA! Regarding the above English translation by Aapo Puhakka, Mikko Ellila/Ellilä claimed that it was "awful" and "very misleading". However, Kenneth Sikorski, who is fluent in both English and Finnish double-checked the translation for me and confirmed that Aapo's translation was pretty good. Mikko disagreed. So I asked him to provide an English translation which he was happy with. He's now done that and I've posted Mikko's authorized and approved English translation HERE alongside the earlier translation in order to make comparison easy. Best Wishes.
  4. Greetings. I have written the first instalment of my detailed analysis on Mikko Ellila's article "Society Consists of People". CLICK HERE to read Part 1: A careful examination of Mikko Ellila’s article, Society Consists of People on the PRODOS Blog. There are also a number of other posts at the blog which examine Mikko's essay and some of the shoddy science on which he is basing some of his claims. Thanks. :-)
  5. Thomas Jefferson to Chastellux, 1785. ME 5:6, Papers 8:186 In Australia, it is a statistical fact that there are proportionally more Aborigines and Muslims in jail than "Anglos". Would it be racist for someone to generalise from this that "there's something about these races" that makes them more prone to criminality? Yes, it would be racist. On the other hand, is someone who believes such a notion closed or hostile to facts? Some people would be closed, blind, even nihilistic. Others would just be mistaken. If Justice - treating a person as he/she deserves - is my aim, it's important to me not to clump these two vastly different types together. To do so would resemble the error of the racist. That's some of the background to my thinking, explaining why I refered to Mikko's assertions as containing "some" racist notions. I welcome debate. Best Wishes.
  6. Good morning. The English translation of the post by Mikko Ellila/Ellilän, and of the charges being levelled against him by Finnish authorities are now online: http://prodos.thinkertothinker.com/?p=325 I note that Mikko's post does include some racist notions, of which I'm critical - as well as poorly reasoned arguments. Nevertheless, I continue to defend his right to Free Speech.
  7. Stephen's Health

    Good morning. About UCLA's Adult Heart Transplant Program Our Love and Prayers to Betsy and Stephen, PRODOS & SYDNEY KENDALL (Melbourne, Australia)
  8. Peikoff on the coming election

    Good afternoon! Thanks. I look forward to your further thoughts! PS: ... and to my $20!
  9. Peikoff on the coming election

    Greetings. It's me: The world's foremost pro-American non-American. I've just finished reading the posts on this thread. I strongly disagree with Leonard Peikoff's position and practically every part of what he says and where he's coming from. From top to bottom, the whole thing is a mess. In fact I even find the original question itself quite offensive in its outlook and tone: "In view of the constant parade of jackassery which is Washington ..." Who asked this question? Was it a journalist? If so, which one? There is no link or reference. Was it Leonard Peikoff himself? Was it one of his colleagues? Was it a student at a lecture? This sort of language being publicly used to characterize the people involved in Government is hardly the tone I'd expect of someone who claims to be "The world's foremost authority on Ayn Rand's philosophy: Objectivism". It's cheap and nasty. And it's unbecoming. From its more lightweight assumptions such as "even if the two parties are both rotten" to its key assumptions "Republicans stand for religion" to its fear of America moving towards some kind of theocracy, Dr Peikoff's comments are way off the mark. "Democrats stand for socialism ... " No they don't. Sure, the Democratic Party has plenty of socialistic types of policies, but I don't see that they stand for Socialism. "Socialism—a fad of the last few centuries ... " Socialism has been a "fad"? A "fad" that has lasted a "few centuries"? Hey, that's some fad! But socialism has "been almost universally rejected for decades"? Has it been rejected? By who? Americans? The world? "Universally"? Does that mean by everyone? By the so-called left? By the intellectuals? I don't understand. Religion is "the destroyer of man since time immemorial"? I don't see how such an assertion can be made. I don't see religion as such to be a destroyer. I don't see it as the only destroyer or even as the greatest destroyer. I think its sloppy of Leonard Peikoff to lump all religions together or to treat Christianity or Christians as one consistent body. It's clear to me how destructive Islam is. But Islam is not just a religion. In what way and at what level is Christianity destructive? For one thing, Christianity as such does not, to my knowledge, advocate the use of force. After 2 years of studying Islam, I've only recently begun studying Christianity. My current project is to root out any evidence of Christian texts advocating either the use of the sword to spread its message and any evidence that Christianity advocates some combination of Church and State. So far I've found nothing. There are other issues I need to explore regarding Christianity. In particular, its position on the mind and the mind's relationship to reality. But let me point the reader to Pope Benedict XVI's amazing 9/12 speech. In this speech one of the world's leading Christian authorities: Invoked the spirit of the Ancient Greeks Criticised Kant Declared that religion/morality and coercion don't mix Leonard Peikoff claims that religion is "is now the only philosophic movement rapidly and righteously rising to take over the government." Hold on a sec! The notion that Americans could ever be moved towards a theocracyis - to put it mildly - ridiculous. Have you ever actually met an American? Have you ever listened to an American talking? Have you ever watched an American working? You should try it some day. On my two visits to the USA I made a point of chatting with as many "average Americans" as I could. This is not a people who will ever accept any sort of dictatorship - socialist, fascist, green, or theocratic. Don't be fooled by appearances. The American spirit is unique. There is nothing like it anywhere. Show me an American and I'll show you a revolutionary. Anyone who underestimates the ability and willingness of Americans to stand up and fight for liberty - their own and that of others - is in for a surprise. During my trips to the United States I met with many religious Americans. Many enthusiastically religious Americans. Driving across the USA we stopped one afternoon to have lunch at a KFC. This big guy with long hair and tatooes came up to me, gave me his card and invited me to his church. I had a pleasant chat with him. And then it struck me. It wasn't that this fellow was being wildly religious. What he was doing was being American! Americans don't wait for permission. They don't wait for things to be handed to them. They go out and get what they want. They go out and build what they need. They're self-reliant. They're high-energy. They get the job done! In America, the atheists are enthusiastic. The Scientologists are enthusiastic. The Christians are enthusiastic. The Socialists are enthusiastic. In America, they don't just play sports. They turn sports into a major event. They bring in the cheerleaders (a distinctly American phenomenon). They bring in big business and big bucks (Business is the business of America). They hype it up. They think big. They enjoy and they profit. They merchandise. They broadcast. Go! Go! Go! USA! And they do it with pride! Every American project is 1776 all over again. And that includes religion. George W Bush - whom I consider a great President - doesn't just go in to topple the Taliban or Saddam Hussein, he goes in to democratise the whole Middle East. It can be done. It should be done! I urge all American Objectivists to VOTE REPUBLICAN on Tuesday. Leonard Peikoff is out of step with all of this. Has he ever met an American?