Eknath Ende

Revised Introduction to 'Democracy as Nemesis of Anglo Saxons'

23 posts in this topic

I have just revised the Introduction to the book (from 1 page to 5 pages) because of big news that I came to know very late, that Obama had invited UN supervisors to observe the presidential elections. This new Intro partly repeats with the sub-article “Conundrum of Angry White Men” already posted because the “revelation” mentioned in Conundrum and the knowledge of above news, both happened very late, and successively.



Introduction:


(The man who invites the Serpent is Re-elected as President: Has the Dismantling of America started?)



Around 2008-09 I sought comments on the net on the first draft of my book “The Anglo Saxon Protestant Revolution” (ASP-R) describing how the ASPs mastered the world after Renaissance, built new continents, and why they are now on a down-ward journey as seen in the recent slide of the US. (As ASPs I today include all people who got naturalized into Americans and broadly adopted the classical Anglo-Saxon philosophy of individualism as their way of life.) I was shocked by the trivial comments, the misunderstandings and criticism based on lack of knowledge and I felt the need to write a prologue to ASP-R as clarification. This prologue became a complete book on its own which I titled as “Is Democracy the Nemesis Also of the Anglo-Saxons?”, generally addressed to the ‘Tea Party (TP) Movement Supporters’, who formed the engine of Republican take-over of the House of Representatives in Nov-Dec 2010. It could not be completed in time for the 2012 elections, but had to be suspended for a long time, and perhaps the TP Movement lost steam in between.


Very briefly, what the book achieves can be described as follows: Starting from a small island on the edge of Europe, the Anglo Saxons built, with tremendous courage, efforts and sacrifice of blood, sweat and life, two virgin continents on two sides of the Pacific, an entirely New World, the climax of rational man’s aspirations for civilization; they are the main contributors to huge discovery and invention of knowledge, and have emancipated 5 sets of people starting with poor ASPs followed by African-Americans, Europeans (many of them Catholics), myriad migrants from undeveloped societies including many Latinos, and finally, all those who are free in undeveloped societies, from 4000 years’ well established suppression and slavery.


But today the emancipators are looked upon as enslavers and racists, the whole earth hates them, and every epithet is unquestionably thrown at them like greedy, selfish, looters of earth, war mongerers etc. But more importantly, the emancipated people who have not contributed much to civilization are out to take-over their countries, and the original creators almost have no answer to it! (Obama’s re-election in 2012 was generally described as contest between ‘angry white men’ versus ‘minorities’!)


As I went on studying this topic of America’s slide (and as news developed and became available to me), today I am shocked into disbelief about the factors involved in it. All over the earth minorities are persecuted, victimized and are at a disadvantage. With America it is the opposite – it is the majority community that is being subjected to huge injustice! And the matter is not as simple as that, but shocking qualifications apply to it.


The minorities inflicting injustice are either emancipated slaves (who have been slaves since mankind’s dawn) or illegal immigrants (Latinos and enemies and haters from all over the earth like Afghans, Iranians, Chinese etc) – men who have contributed nothing to civilization but gained heavily from the majority – such minorities are now destroying the civilization built by the white man led by the ASPs. The further qualification is that the minorities are not taking over because they are vastly improved, have acquired some great powers arising out of achievement, but they are the same doles-depending backward people who have now become self-righteously demanding – on the other hand the community of creators and achievers has been appeasing and apologizing to the extent of being cowards. (If one studies only the issue of racism (about twenty-six pages included in this book) – its rampant practice world over never opposed by anybody, compared to the enlightenment brought in by the ASPs, and the allegations made against them – one will be aghast at the inversion, what I call as Reverse Racism. The only phrase that should strike one is “hatred of the good for being the good”; but the way I experienced and observed it, even reckless over-magnanimity and cowardice on the part of the ASPs are involved.)



This situation is so because the Anglo Saxons reached the end of their intellectual resources (sometime back when the slide started imperceptibly) and are unable to defend themselves and their unique way of life of individualism, and counter an irrational, ‘undeveloped’ world’s onslaught against them. They do not understand that this fight is not about muscles but about intellectuality.



The Greeks lost in battle (but democracy contributed to their weakness). Romans fell because of Republic slowly degenerating into democracy and transforming into dictatorship, internal wars etc. America degenerated from Republic to democracy to chaos of mob-rule faster because of ‘minorities’ that were not allowed to participate in Rome. The way America is progressing it will mostly not be an honorable death, but a shameless, ignominious capitulation to the combined group of the immoral, murderous but impotent cowards of the United Nations whose only strength is white peoples’ cowardice, emancipated 4000 year-old slaves, and lastly illegal immigrants, all of them who obtain their funding / doles by making wild allegations and abusing the white man. As is being developed in this book, I will say: “You too deserve it white man! In fact your contribution has to be more than their ability to rob and destroy; else it can not happen on such a grand scale!”


(Actually this is described ahead as civilization turning full circle – heroes are martyred, but bring in liberty from tyranny (along with knowledge and all other virtues) spreading emancipation to lowest men; but with the help of this lowest strata evil men destroy their civilization.)



America has just unfolded the last leg of her fall! Suddenly the UN’s role is so expanded (mainly after Obama, 2008) that it looks like transforming itself from ‘moral authority’ to take over as ‘world government’! A huge part of science (climate change, clean energy etc) is with it (where big corruption and falsity is being practiced). Its issuing international currency, SDRs etc is being mooted for some time now, and even control over internet, arms trade are being surrendered to it. It has the largest army (‘peace-keeping force’) after the US; but the US, already subservient to the UN masters, is proceeding to submit her sovereignty to the impotents. (This book contains nearly 50 pages of writing about how and why America is commiting suicide by using the UN as E I Co – example of victory of evil when good tries to compromise with it.)


The sub-article “An Inverted America – Is it heading towards a collapse?” just ahead, describes how much America is eroded in terms of basic principles. While I have shown how the two political parties (Dems and Reps) have been taking America imperceptibly to the abyss, one small step at a time, President Obama inviting UN inspectors to oversee US elections marks a very big downward jump. It indicates that the process of erosion due to democracy is over, and the process of dismantling America has started – it is a proof that the US cannot reconcile its internal differences and therefore needs an external umpire. (Primarily the internal differences are between the ‘way of life’ of the whites versus the minorities, individualism versus government welfare, but not allowed to so identify due to cowardice.) Everybody has heard about the monkey usurping all the butter belonging to the fighting cats. Here’s a similar one from ancient India – two groups of frogs in a well, yellow and black, fight unendingly like the cats. The leader of the yellow ones goes out and invites a serpent against the blacks. Predictably, the serpent first eats all the black frogs, and then starts with the yellow ones till he finishes all the leader’s relatives, children and wife. Then the yellow leader cries. In America, the yellow leaders are unlikely to cry – they may gloat, having achieved their purpose of destruction. A combination of the impotent (but deceptive) monkey and the venomous serpent is the more appropriate symbol for the UN impotents. (Yet – do not underestimate the impotent; his strength accrues out of the fact that the whites are cowardly about several allegations made against them, and are also unable to act unitedly because of reasons described below and in the entire book. The way I saw menial, slavish Sri Lankans defeating Europeans and ASPs at each others’ hands in the Iraq project I worked on, which is also the way the ASPs are imperceptibly losing to the UN, should make a rational man aghast – any rational man will take lessons from it, but not the mighty ASPs who are bent on committing suicide at the hands of impotents.)


Also note another important point – the above was not the last news about UN’s intrusion in US, rather it was the start. Arms treaty happened, but it does not involve the US alone, it has a seeming international aura – one repercussion is that the UN is increasing its role as international authority. In the coming years more and more negative news about UN will develop because – the Dems will repeatedly employ this as their tool to defeat the Reps; they will surely increase US reliance on UN. Importantly, the Rep conservatives do not have any good answer to this issue except for cheating (using UN as E I Co), wherein they will always become the fools of the situation, being novices in cheating as compared to the post-doctorates of ‘undeveloped’ countries. This truly is going to be the last leg of the fight (even if stretched over a few decades), unless some drastic change of fundamentals is introduced as a game-changer.


Another indication that the process of break-up of America is started is the formation of white groups (like the recent White Students Union in Baltimore to counter minorities’ collective savagery, the Neo-Nazi groups in US army, the comments seen on the net against illegal immigrants and anti-social activities by minorities, etc) – a society that was the most enlightened and magnanimous on earth is finally being forced to give up its rational way of life due to others’ refusal to accept rationality (and whites’ inability to answer it intellectually).


Remember that the Latinos and other illegal migrants from all over the earth are set to increase in the coming decades (when I predict that final collapse will take place). The UN and the rest of the anti-white world will aid that process, I heard arguments while working for UN in Iraq that US and Australia could absorb more than today’s world population but the bastards don’t want to sacrifice – a few decades down the whites’ percentage in population will decrease far more than today – what will they do then? Those few decades is the only time they have to get their act together.



America will not be defeated by an external enemy; but she is proceeding towards internal collapse. When that becomes imminent, other nations will move in – those nations are now already united, as United Nations. The vultures are not only circling in the skies in expectation of a feast, but are being invited to share the carcasses! So far the UN impotents, after taking American / Western money (with the West being their only strength), routinely slapped their benefactors in many matters like recognition of Palestine, encouragement to dictators, allegations against US army, etc, but that was from outside. Now, while shedding tears by writing reports about condition of homeless in America, they are suddenly the supervisors in America’s internal affairs!


Important point: Whether the impotents entered US (for inspection of polls) is secondary – the more important point is that the man who made such a ghastly proposal was convincingly re-elected as President! (That is the more important indicator of America’s erosion. It raises the question: What is the use of so much abusive noise the whites are making on the net?) Even in India, a predominantly illiterate and semi-literate country, nobody would have dared to make such a proposal. There used to be rampant rigging, “booth-capturing”, prohibition of weaker castes in participation of elections, etc. But they sorted it out by computerizing and phasing the elections, supervison by an independent authority and observation by all political parties under military and para-military protection to reduce unfairness to appreciably low levels. But now with the US setting the precedent perhaps everybody may invite the UN in the future; after all, the US is the world leader, though in this respect the direction is wrong. Question is: can the US not settle the election issue internally, if India could with all its handi-caps, diversity, backwardness, illiteracy and corruption?


For reasons explained continuously in the book I do not balme Obama exclusively – he is contributing to the fall, but not more than most of his political colleagues and opponents. (The big downward jump he has taken can be attributed mainly to the fact that that is the point where the competition between the two bad parties to win power reached. The previous big jumps were – not New Deal – but T Roosevelt’s anti-trust acts and Woodrow Wilson’s “idealism” which made New Deal, the UN etc possible.) Society too, having become irrational due to democracy, has influence on rulers’ behavior by discouraging better policies from being implemented. Note important point: Obama has merely invited the UN now – but the UN was originated and carefully nurtured (i.e. milk was fed to the cobra) by the ASPs during better times as some kind of (foolish) ideal (which covered their cowardice); later they tried to use it as East India Co. And only now the inevitable has happened that the UN monster is trying to take them under its control. And even now, many of the whites do not want the UN to be abolished – they only want that it be beaten to a level acceptable to them so that it will not come in their way but merely endorse their E I Co activities. Obama cannot alone be blamed.



If the whites are unable to produce some good arguments, then the US is as good as gone, but for some gasping prior to death, which gives a small chance for recovery. (Dismantling US too will take decades). With some state governors threatening to attack UN inspectors (and setting the style of opposition), they are also progressing, even if imperceptibly, towards a civil war. (The ‘sentimental whites’ on the internet sites I visit were already describing family members crying on Obama’s re-election, prayers to the Lord, and some talking about migration! On the other hand, the Attila-like ‘angry white men’ (described ahead) were generally aggressive / defiant, a few even talking about civil war!)



Overall I only feel a peculiar mixture of sorrow and shocked disbelief at the developments. How can they destroy themselves so very easily? They don’t deserve the greatness they inherited from their forefathers? As far as I see it, today’s Anglo Saxons do not have it in them to generate defense against – should I say ‘undeveloped’ people, to be politically correct and save myself from those ‘undeveloped’ people? They are unable to produce the arguments that will morally inspire and unite them for a combined defense. Just consider as an example one of their major forms of protests today, the Tea Party Movement (to whom this book was originally addressed) – who are they fighting against? Not any foreigners because as far as the external world is concerned America is truly beyond challenge. They protest against their own people; but these are the people in power because of wrong philosophy and it is against this wrong philosophy that the ASPs are unable to produce any convincing arguments that will unite them.


Apart from these ‘angry white men’, most intellectuals too are ineffective (or the good ones have very less say in society); this is described in detail in this book, and how Americans should overcome it is also shown.


Ego is the faculty one uses for knowing the world and making decisions; it is not infallible and any man can make mistakes while using it. Better men make less mistakes and more correct usage; mean little egoists are people who misuse the faculty in a peculiar manner; usually they are unwilling to see the better alternatives, and continue to stick to their small-time thinking in spite of it being obviously wrong, inspite of correct alternatives being obvious. This is the reason why today the whites are unable to put up a united defense and their shameful defeat at the hands of emancipated people and illegal immigrants dependent on doles! Both, the intellectuals and the rowdy angry white men, are sufficiently responsible for this state. The intellectuals stick to their mean little ego; the rowdies have the choice to support better intellectuals, but do not avail of it.



Many factors contributed to this state of America, but all of them have a common root – aversion of basic principles (part of which is their anathema for philosophers like Plato and Aristotle). They justify this aversion by emphasis on what they call as pragmatism or practicality. (Even now, when the ‘undeveloped’ minorities are taking over their country, and the UN has made inroad into it, they don’t want to study basic principles; all they want is rowdyism and boisterousness.) This has made them ‘men without philosophy’ despite being good men, i.e. closer to Attila. Their magnanimity becomes over-generosity; they are subjected to demoralization due to “hatred of the good for being the good” practiced the world over; they have lot of misunderstandings about the world and in particular, lack of knowledge of evil; but they also have a strong arrogance of not accepting / rectifying these lacks. (Their confidence in superiority of American political system is unshakeable – even at a time when the weaknesses of that system are the cause of shameless defeat at the hands of the irrational! But that unshakeable confidence also comes out of not wanting to study basic philosophy). Aversion for basic principles has actually converted them into cowards, which is the root of giving in to all those unbelievable accusations and abuses from minorities who have contributed nothing to civilization, takeover by minorities and now induction of UN into their internal matters!


Just as some examples of the above: It is as part of this aversion to basic principles that they sidelined Ayn Rand when she uniquely foresaw many things like the evil of UN; today they use her name as opportunism. Another example is that movements like the tea parties lose their strength so very fast because of lack of fundamental philosophy – today “I came, I conquered”, tomorrow foooos, so much steam gone. (The other alternatives of whites are not even worth discussing – e.g. appeals to religion – That was the base American Revolution dislodged first and foremost with the first amendment.)



The important point is: There have to be some fundamental issues, some key principles / thoughts and line of action over which they have to unite; else they will never be able to stop the ‘undeveloped’ people taking over their country. In fact solution is available in the analysis and refutation of those wrong ideas / concepts which most Americans hold as unchallengeable and sacred – but such analysis is not allowed, the pragmatists are very strongly against it. But these angry white men and their small time intellectuals will never be able to find that line of action because of their aversion for fundamentals. (The main aim of this book is to refute the wrong ideas and find these key principles, this line of action that will save America.)


Many sacredly held wrong notions of Americans are dealt with upto the end in this book, but just as example consider the concept “All men were created equal” – if all men were really equal (without proper qualification) then: 1. whatever is happening in the US is to be accepted as right (irrespective of whether it is really right or no), just because it is happening with the backing of more number of “equal” votes; 2. Importantly, we should have a global democracy (since all men are equal), and the agency most suitable for the purpose is the United Nations! Why should angry white men raise so much of a hue and cry against the Dems and the UN? And who will consider them as rational; rather why will people not oppose them? 3. At least 6 billion people on earth (out of 7 billion) will pronounce Americans as the most evil people on earth, looters and murderers, and Satan’s land – and if the phrase “All men are equal” is correct without qualifications we will have to accept that as true (because of such overwhelming majority saying it). (The fact is that the world does consider America to be evil, and instead of challenging it intellectually, they are apologizing together with minor cheating via the UN as E I Co). 4. As a final point against this concept here (its analysis is pursued to the end of the book) imagine the army (or any other organization) where the cadets, the junior officers etc tell their seniors that all men are equal and each one should take his own decision – there will be chaos if men really acted as per this idea. That is how it should be in socio-political and intellectual issues too, i.e. like in any organization, people should organize themselves in a hierarchical manner with top positions for the most rational and intelligent leaders; but in this realm, people have to choose the better politicians and intellectuals voluntarily, have to use their ego very scrupulously; and that is where everything breaks loose, mean little ego comes in, and the irrational takes over.


Apart from “all men were created equal”, other sacred catch-phrases of Americans such as “ancient philosophers (including Aristotle) preach inequality”, “the only salient point about European / British rule of the earth was its looting” etc have also contributed to today’s slide, as shown in the detail in the book.


Because of Americans’ anathema for basic principles, generally a foreigner only will save America. Americans’ highest influences – Locke, Von Mises, Ayn Rand were all foreigners and moreover fugitives and runaways. The big negative influences too were foreign, topmost Kant amongst them.



All the above aspects are described in detail over the entire book. (Because Ayn Rand’s name surfaced strongly during the Tea Parties, quotes from her works are liberally used. But this book is not an endorsement of some small Objectivist group, rather as part of intellectuals critical comments are made against them also.)


The book is divided into three parts. It would have been possible to merge these three parts with ASP-R itself, and also to better the write-up with final touches, but the situation arising out of the persecution I underwent has allowed me to present the material only as below.


Part I lists out and briefly explains many political concepts that have influenced man’s attempts to form a good government since ancient times, particularly Greek and Roman civilizations from where America has borrowed so much. (Some of these are Americans’ unshakeable, unchallengeable, sacred, pious tenets that they use recklessly against opponents in arguments.) It takes review of American history since inception to bring out the contribution of the two bad parties in gradually changing the American republic into today’s chaos of unlimited majority rule.


Part II uses history reviewed in Part I to further analyze why America is proceeding exactly on the same path as Greece and Rome towards collapse. A shocking fact related with this slide is that it is exactly predicted by a man 2500 years back – Plato! (But since Americans look down upon ancient philosophers, they will never learn things from them.) Even America’s Founding Fathers were strongly against democracy as “chaos of mob-rule” and had predicted the same path of destruction leading to today’s situation. This part of the book raises and partly answers what I have called as “The Problem of Civilization”, fundamental questions about democracy over which Greece and Rome failed, and America is faltering precariously.


Part III deals with a practical example of ASPs’ moral cowardice during last century. It describes in detail an example of ‘Victory of Evil over Good’, of how the Anglo Saxons are bent on self-destruction at the hands of impotent evil from all over the world by dealing with it via ultra-evil bodies like UN. Importantly, it discusses why the British rule during the Empire, despite some deficiencies, was far better than American domination of the world today; and what is wrong with America’s external policies also throws light on internal policies which add to today’s slide. (This involves refutation of their unshakeable confidence in superiority of American political ideas, spread of Jeffersonian democracy, etc.) About this UN connection I have said with explanation that once the greatest emancipator in mankind’s history, today America has become the perpetrator of biggest crimes against humanity because of its support to the UN. Part III includes a long sub-article on Racism practiced the world over – a solid example of huge magnanimity of Anglo Saxons, their great emancipation of mankind, and very unfortunately and sorrowfully, also their lack of knowledge of evil, cowardice of accepting any allegations at the hands of the same evil world that practices hatred of the good for being the good as a routine way of life.


Some more points covered in Parts II and III are given at the end of Part I. 26. The book offers a temporary solution to stop the slide and gain time, and finally offers at least guidelines for a permanent solution.



One person commented that I have been critical to the point of rejection – but does the whites’ performance in the twentieth century merit praise? I do not agree with that. Will euphemizing, evasion, rationalization etc help in the present circumstances, particularly when America is hanging precariously and the whites have never acquired the habit of self-introspection about their political thoughts? I do not think not being critical, false eulogies etc will help; and I believe that I have criticized only to the required extent, according praise wherever merited – after all I have called America (in her original founding and achievements) as ‘the climax of rational man’s aspiration of civilization’! I have called the American as the most enlightened, magnanimous man – his magnanimity becoming over-generosity and cowardice in the twentieth century!



Appeal to / Test of Patriotism of Americans seen on the Internet: I have been traveling on internet sites for 2 purposes: 1. to study the American mind; why a country as great as America should unstoppably slide and nobody be able to stop its fall; 2. to look for that / those rare mind(s) which will be able to connect me to help after noting that I have something worth contributing but am helpless due to my position in India. (Winning arguments, a loser’s game, was never my intention – even now I will pull out if I note it is heading towards that). I came under persecution for speaking vociferously against the UN but not writing, as demanded by a fanatic Hindu organization, against US-UK-Australia and Christians – they wanted it to help their propaganda against these countries leading to beating of Christians prior to elections. On some internet sites I have already given details of my complaint to Minority Commission in India which includes my challenge to the American President for supporting the UN; I can challenge them for whatever destruction is going on due to internal policies too (give good ammo to the whites who are shouting hoarse but ineffectively). There are people on these forums that are sympathetic but not in a position to help – but there are also many who have gathered only like illiterate women gather for gossip near village wells. I am not asking for anybody’s neck or even the smallest amount of money though Americans are super-rich and splurge madly. I have seen them talk a lot about patriotism, their family members cried on Obama’s re-election, they talk about civil war for the shining city on the hill, etc. But if somebody has genuine feeling for America and is in a position to do so, then all I am expecting is that he will lift a finger just from his sitting position in front of the computer – connect me to an organization that is fighting for the original America, or even dealing with persecution of Christians the world over from where my case with the Minority Commission in India will gain prominence and I will be able to fight for America.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are aware the good WASP Christians, in their time, practiced chattel slavery and the ownership of Negro bodies?

The Confederacy was white and protestant down to the sub-atomic level.

ruveyn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are aware the good WASP Christians, in their time, practiced chattel slavery and the ownership of Negro bodies? The Confederacy was white and protestant down to the sub-atomic level.

Gee, no, we had never heard of slavery and the Civil War ending it -- in accordance with the fundamental principles on which the country was founded. And we still wouldn't know it but for your "contributions", obnoxiously repeating irrelevancies to the topic under discussion as you stick your thumb in people's eyes to "inform" us -- except that your "informing" keeps leaving out the last part. But fortunately we of course do know all about it and see the obvious irrelevance of the obnoxious, pointless, and repetitive disruptions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To return to the topic of the essay, to begin with the author would do well to strip out the references to the "white man", which are racist by nature, and replace them with the kind of culture he refers to, which is all that matters, not race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are aware the good WASP Christians, in their time, practiced chattel slavery and the ownership of Negro bodies?

They actually invented slavery . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are aware the good WASP Christians, in their time, practiced chattel slavery and the ownership of Negro bodies? The Confederacy was white and protestant down to the sub-atomic level.

But fortunately we of course do know all about it and see the obvious irrelevance of the obnoxious, pointless, and repetitive disruptions.

There is an entire sub-article "Inheritance -- An important factor while evaluating historical phenomena and personalities" in the other post of this book which refutes the above allegation very well. Such comments actually disrupt, and I usually withdraw without answering. I could have answered PhilO's comment on another essay about Rome and Washington, but I already see the pointless arguments that will ensue, branching and so on without any end -- better to keep quiet and pursue one's purpose.

To return to the topic of the essay, to begin with the author would do well to strip out the references to the "white man", which are racist by nature, and replace them with the kind of culture he refers to, which is all that matters, not race.

This is a very big topic of misunderstanding, wrong ideas / definitions etc, and the inevitable has to happen if one does not soon adopt the correct ideas -- that the white American is in reality the one who brought in enlightenment and emancipation; rest of the world very strongly practices hate (in some form or the other like India's caste system) -- but these latter are never pointed finger at, while there is a barrage of allegations and accusations against the white American, and he is paying eternally and infinitely -- it represents a shockingly massive inversion which will never get cleared unless one attributes their characteristics to races. Anyway, I have said at the top that all ideas that look racist are justified ahead, and there is an 18 page long sub-article on Racism which will come ahead, so it would be premature to explain this at the moment. I hope you are aware about the wrong image that America has acquired the world over (Satan's Land etc), the opposite of the one she deserves! It has caused immense demoralization to the good people who partly respond with cowardice, appeasing evil, etc.

I am just happy that some people have taken the efforts to read -- my purpose is to rectify the above wrongs. They have given me encouragment to continue posting further material.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point I was making by noting the history of the South is that the WASP cultural inheritance does no justice to liberty. There are just as many WASPs anti-liberty as pro-liberty. In a word, being a bearer of WASP culture is no guarantee of virtue.

But there I go agaIn. Being a stickler for historical fact and overlooking the "big picture".

Like I saId to the Emperor the other day -- your majesty, you are as naked as a J-Bird.

ruveyn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not a "stickler for accuracy", you have out of context pet peeves that you repeat here over and over as unexplained broadsides without regard to the fact that you have been answered and refuted many times by people here who are way ahead of you. Sarcastic insinuations that we don't know there was slavery are not rational. Your constant sticking your thumb in people's eyes is not exposing anyone's "nakedness" and is not serious discussion, only obnoxious repetition of your own obstinate ignorance and goading mentality. The "culture" that the American founders "inherited" was the Enlightenment of rationality and individualism, not your racist "WASP" denigration. The founders of the country endorsed principles that ultimately eliminated the slavery that they did not originate and could not eliminate themselves. When more people realized that African slaves appeared 'inferior' because of the conditions they had been kept in, not because of innate characteristics, it became feasible to eliminate slavery in the predominately feudalist south, which was done at great cost by "WASPS", beginning with the abolitionist movement. The principles making it possible had been there all along despite the attempt by feudalists to ignore them. It had nothing to do with "WASP" inheritance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To return to the topic of the essay, to begin with the author would do well to strip out the references to the "white man", which are racist by nature, and replace them with the kind of culture he refers to, which is all that matters, not race.

This is a very big topic of misunderstanding, wrong ideas / definitions etc, and the inevitable has to happen if one does not soon adopt the correct ideas -- that the white American is in reality the one who brought in enlightenment and emancipation; rest of the world very strongly practices hate (in some form or the other like India's caste system) -- but these latter are never pointed finger at, while there is a barrage of allegations and accusations against the white American, and he is paying eternally and infinitely -- it represents a shockingly massive inversion which will never get cleared unless one attributes their characteristics to races. Anyway, I have said at the top that all ideas that look racist are justified ahead, and there is an 18 page long sub-article on Racism which will come ahead, so it would be premature to explain this at the moment. I hope you are aware about the wrong image that America has acquired the world over (Satan's Land etc), the opposite of the one she deserves! It has caused immense demoralization to the good people who partly respond with cowardice, appeasing evil, etc...

There is no justification for analysis in terms of race. "White America" is rhetorically in contrast to "black" and other races who happen to have lived here. The color is an irrelevant contingency. People of all "races" have been on all sides of all issues, regardless of what color may have been most prevalent at any particular point in time. That some people have been and continue in different parts of the world to be targeted for their race is racism, not caused by race. To attribute any historical trends to a race is itself racist. If you want to be taken seriously then explain whatever your positions are in terms of the ideas that people held, not their color.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are aware the good WASP Christians, in their time, practiced chattel slavery and the ownership of Negro bodies?

They actually invented slavery . . .

There was an institution of slavery, including white slaves, in Africa long before the British slave trade brought it to America, but it isn't true to say that slavery was invented either by "WASPS" or blacks in Africa (which is what I think you meant). There were slaves all over the world, including among native Indians in the America enslaving competing tribes, going back thousands of years. It was a logical outgrowth of the pervasive, primitive tribalism of early humans everywhere. Progress in civilization has required freeing the individual from the tribe of all kinds everywhere, and the Enlightenment and its implementation in government in individualist America was the major leap forward. It didn't completely eliminate the tribalist mentality, even here, and in many ways that has progressively become worse since then, especially over the last century of Progressivism and socialism, but it was the major step that must be defended and improved on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ewv: To attribute any historical trends to a race is itself racist. If you want to be taken seriously then explain whatever your positions are in terms of the ideas that people held, not their color.

Reply: As I said, the complete explanation will come only when the sub-article on Racism is reached. But at the moment I will say that saying -- "Anglo Saxon way of life in modern times brought back civilization. All people giving up their countries to migrate to America are specifically doing so because of that culture. Many other races made individual contributions but they would have remained unborn the way they have remained during dark ages. Good example is India, representative for whole earth. Indians are making good in US, acknowledged as intelligent, did well during British times, but even today in India the same people are not doing as good at all. That is because of white man's culture and way of life, and I refuse to accept that making this statement of fact is racist. Calling it so is encouragement to evil, as the Democracts, and several appeasers are doing, and as I have shown in detail ahead." Amongst others, this is a major contributor to America's erosion today -- it is simply erosion of white man's way of life with others' dole-demanding ways. This too is not racist because it is fact of reality. In a very planned manner the Dems are nurturing minorities as their vote-block -- show courage in fighting them; not me who is bringing out facts and undoing evil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evaluating people by their race is racist. Trying to explain trends in a culture in terms of the "white man" and an ancestry of "Anglo Saxon" is overtly racist. If you don't mean to be racist and have only adopted the wrong label, perhaps out of some custom you hear a lot in India, then it is easy to fix by changing the label you use and better explaining it. No one here in America uses terminology like "the white man" and "Anglo Saxon" except racist leftists. People of all "races" are on all sides of every issue; race is irrelevant. If you do mean appeal to race as a relevant characteristic for anything other than describing racism, then you will find no sympathy here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anglo-Saxon culture is responsible for all this? From what point on? Might as well claim the Vatican and its spin-offs are responsible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To ewv: Because of your persistence I was forced to add the following to my file (initial part of it is repetitive on this board, but you are far more so): So much is the erosion of reason and confidence in America that the charge of racism was again repetitively thrown at me after the above hurriedly expanded Introduction. I responded that the complete explanation will come only when the sub-article on Racism is reached ahead. But at the moment I will say that merely expressing the following facts is not racism: "Anglo Saxon way of life in modern times brought back civilization. All people giving up their countries to migrate to America are specifically doing so because of that culture. Many other races made individual contributions but they would have remained unborn the way they remained during dark ages. Good example is India, representative for whole earth. Indians are making good in US, acknowledged as intelligent, did well during British times, but even today in India the same people are not doing as good at all. That is because of white man's culture and way of life (specifically ASP), and I refuse to accept that making this statement of fact is racist. Calling it so is encouragement to evil, as some politicians, and several appeasers are doing, and as I have shown in detail ahead." Amongst others, this is a major contributor to America's erosion today -- it is simply erosion of white man's way of life due to others' dole-demanding ways. This too is not racist because saying so has a basis. In a much planned manner some politicians are nurturing minorities as their vote-block -- show courage in fighting them; not me who is bringing out facts and undoing evil. Stop NAACP, BET, Black Music Awards, Black Beauty Contests etc, oppose the special name Af-Ams, why not Ams only? White-Ams is evil and Af-Ams is not? As per my info, El Raza is specifically race based organization of Hispanics, try and stop that. There are also people who have shown encouragement to this write-up – many are tired with the erosion as well as appeasement, and want to settle the issue now. GOP is always accused of being racist and recently admitted that they did not want to come off as ‘a bunch of angry white men’ – but close to 50% (+ or -) America has always voted for them. (Despite being the most magnanimous society, this maligning is the work of people like you – destroyers of civilization. What will remain once the whites are fully demoralized?)

You have surprised me: If the moderator has passed my posts who are you to talk in that language, and moreover to talk for everybody? After GOP I specifically changed Anglo Saxons in sub-title of my book to Angry White Men – but there are reasons for doing all this. If the moderator tells me I will stop posting (but still not consider myself as racist). You talk about thoughts, but are also dragging nationality in to rally gullible people against me? Many Americans adopt Indian thoughts like Hare Rama-Krishna for example, or far eastern Zen Buddhism as another one. So I have adopted the ASP way of life, what has it got to do with rest of India?

I stop responding to you (unless something better comes) and proceed with my work of further posting. If majority agree with ewv please tell me so, else let’s forget.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is most "repetitive" is your refusal to acknowledge that your repeated references to "the White Man" and "Anglo Saxon" are racist. Insisting that your racism is "factual" does not make it non-racist. There is no excuse for racism, in a "later chapter" or anywhere else. As already explained, if it were only a matter of improper labels for something else valid then it would be easy for you to fix. Your repeated refusal implies that you are in fact a racist. If you don't want repeated rejection as a racist then don't be a racist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Related to this subject, I previously wrote:

On Race and Culture.
It is always frustrating to me when I encounter those who argue from a view that culture and race are so
connected that to criticize one, is to criticize the other. In this way, any questioning of cultural practices or
values is effectively silenced for fear of being labelled a racist.
To be clear, I will make this claim: there is no necessary connection between a person's genetic makeup,
and the ideas they hold.
Clearly, one has no say in one's genetic heritage, but just as clearly, every human has the choice of which
ideas / values he will embrace. A culture is the result of the dominant ideas held in that society, and since
ideas can be rejected or accepted regardless of racial factors, they can also be evaluated without making a
racial connection with such appraisal.
Unfortunately, it is now almost impossible to venture an opinion on the ideas someone holds, without the
inference that it is also an opinion on race.
Cultural ideas are open to choice, and that necessitates that they be open to evaluation as well. A free
society must always hold the door open to challenge prevailing attitudes. Too many times times the door is
slammed shut when cultural values are challenged, along with accusations of racism.
The irony for many professed 'non racists,'
is that open racists agree with them, that is, their idea of a racial
connection to culture, and, likewise see issues in terms of racial groupings rather than a colourblind
individualism, or as Martin Luther said “the content of their character.”
Once again; since ideas are open to choice, they must be open to question. This has nothing to do with
genetics. Those who would stifle inquiring minds with blind political dogma reflect a middle ages ignorance,
not the enlightenment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Multiculturalists and leftists in general accuse almost anything in sight they don't like as being 'racist'. They are the racists, along with the rest of their collectivism, and even their appeals to 'ethnicity' are racist in character. See Ayn Rand's "Global Balkanization" in Return of the Primitive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To elevate blood and mindless adherence to tradition above the real ideas that made the US possible(and powerful) is a gross injustice. Capitalism and selfishness have no use for "white-culture" or Anglo-Saxon anything, only real human values matter. If you want to study a social system built specifically around collectivism, race, blood, and "white-culture"; see Nazi Germany.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to these charges of racism (perhaps some resulting out of the deep misunderstandings created by political vested interest), I suddenly realized (i.e. sort of revelation, what Ayn Rand called as 'the light bulb effect') that there is an irrefutable argument against these charges. At the moment I am not producing it in this comment. But those who want to make allegations only when words white, anglo saxon etc are used, should reply to my previous comment -- why Af-Am allowed, why are they not only Ams, why El Raza (the race) allowed, etc. Please see that comment from me, just above.

Presently I have included the following in the book based on John's comment above:

Why single out Nazis, because of the holocaust, or white skin? Commies (Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao and many others), many Hindus, Muslims etc did same, but Dark Ages are most well documented (and this too was white skin). Whole human history is the same – even the Greeks and the Romans who produced the base of all human knowledge were not magnanimous to other races. Amongst all these ‘ways of life’ named after people only the Anglo Saxon ‘way of life’ is unique in its magnanimity and enlightenment, and the knowledge it has produced. What is wrong in stating this till ----- at this point comes my irrefutable argument against charges of racism against whites, included in my book, but not in this post ---- Does one become a Nazi or a Commie – or to use your charge – a racist when one says Anglo Saxon?

Now, how to kill this magnanimous ASP ‘way of life’? Apart from the slow poisoning of welfare state, promote and pamper other races as ‘minorities’, name them as Af-Ams, Hispanics etc and practice huge Reverse Racism (described ahead). Create special name for some Americans as Af-Ams, but as soon as one utters Anglo Saxon, declare him to be a racist! All of this is the technique of those who practice hatred of good for being the good. When this happens beyond tolerable limits and threatens to destroy society, whites will resort to racism against entire races. This is described ahead as Backlash, which is developing in the US. An important part of the technique of the haters is not to allow study of racial characteristics, i.e. facts related with races (may be genetic / biological, i.e. evolved in nature, or cultural, i.e. due to underlying philosophy, ‘way of life’ etc, and therefore transient, changeable – as soon as such a study is undertaken, or one mentions superiority of certain races (obviously ASP in this instance because of their ‘way of life’), the hater starts shouting hoarse about racism while he himself practices covert Reverse Racism for nurturing vote-blocks. (At the moment this is not against anybody on this board, but vested interest who have deeply entrenched this practice). It is now upto the benevolent community to take their right back to study facts about races. Because some Chinese traveled twice in a container box (and died in the second attempt) to breathe fresh air in ‘the land of the free’, because some Afghans, Iranians etc ran away from their countries (usually carrying their hatred for freedom along with them), therefore it is not necessary for the benevolent community to feel embarrassed in pronouncing ‘my Anglo Saxon culture’ – they should not feel embarrassed that 4000 year old slavery overlapped the initial years of their great nation – they should be proud that ‘our culture emancipated whosoever is free amongst men on earth’ – and they should immediately undertake study of races for various purposes listed ahead. (The whites should realize that while huge Reverse Racism (described ahead) goes on in their society, only they not being allowed to refer to racial characteristics is a suppression of their freedom of thought and expression, of their right to defend themselves from things inimical to them. As far as I am concerned, they can call me a racist; I shall call them as ‘haters of the good for being the good’.)

PS: I have also posted the third OP from my book, Post 3. Those interested in knowing truth beyond artificial chargesof racism may please see and shift discussion to other comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your convoluted 'explanations' are unintelligible apologetics for racism. "White skin" is not the cause of any political ideology or culture, and certainly not individualism. "Anglo Saxon" is used to refer to either a "white north American English-speaking" person, or a person or descendent of people who were Germanic inhabitants of England between the 5th century and the Norman Conquest. Neither has anything whatsoever to do with the philosophy of individualism inherent in the founding of this country. One can refer to a particular "race" to designate, for example, a secondary demographic statistic or the kind of people who are the target of some particular acts of racism, but not as as a characteristic of a culture or philosophy, or assessment of character, knowledge, etc. You are a racist. Ayn Rand was not a racist and emphatically denounced it. No "light bulbs" will save you from that. Your insistent racism does not belong here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to these charges of racism (perhaps some resulting out of the deep misunderstandings created by political vested interest), I suddenly realized (i.e. sort of revelation, what Ayn Rand called as 'the light bulb effect') that there is an irrefutable argument against these charges. At the moment I am not producing it in this comment. But those who want to make allegations only when words white, anglo saxon etc are used, should reply to my previous comment -- why Af-Am allowed, why are they not only Ams, why El Raza (the race) allowed, etc. Please see that comment from me, just above.

The reason that the allegations have occurred only when the words white, A-S, etc are used because you have been using them and they deserve to be attacked. Collectivism is collectivism. The reason why African-Americans, and other groups are "allowed" to identify and associate by their race is something called individual rights. They do so freely, that is their right, and the consequences are their problem not mine. What you are advocating is far worse and is a morally treasonous approach, that is: If they can be racist why can't I? A second-hander to second-handers. You are dispensing with your own mind and depending specifically on the unreason of others to form your own position on the subject.

I referenced Nazi Germany because it obviously refutes your methodology and is well documented both in terms of concrete details and essential ideas. See, Leonard Peikoff's book: The Ominous Parallels. That is a great example of how history actually works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Just a response of some basic points, I have not even re-read. My sub-article about the phenomenon is much longer. I no more see the need to spend too much time when men have such opinions and I will end this argument from my side.) Af-Ams wouldn’t have known what is freedom, what are rights, what is champagne etc except for the magnanimity of the Anglo Saxons, as are the conditions in Africa – the world too would not have known civilization (its cornerstone being ‘rights of an individual’, a uniquely ASP concept) – More importantly, even today, neither the world understands it all, nor the Af-Ams who misuse that freedom and those rights to behave as a racial block and undermine the emancipators; and there are vested interests working all over the world (including inside America) not to let anybody understand the whole phenomenon. The whole world looks at America as Satan’s Land and as looters – but even within America this view is slowly being encouraged that the white man is evil.


There is an imminent need externally to set an example and tell other people whom they should respect and emulate. The world will do it in its own time and till then will suffer the consequences. But there is more imminent need to do it within America so as to protect the way of life of the white Americans, which is substantially eroded due to lack of identification of who is eroding it. There is an imminent need to expose that party. It is the GOP that emancipated them, or rather the more rational whites fought with relatively less ones (the Democrats), who even later on ran KKK, segregation etc – BUT – who later on saw that this mass of emancipated people can be used for vested interest by again undermining America by huge doles, and who now “own” this vote-block by continuously further eroding America by socialism (which is not collectivism in your view so as to oppose me) and Reverse Racism. They vote 95+% for the Dems specifically for undermining America and this is merely their individual right and not a movement of destruction purposefully encouraged! The repeat of the same encouragement is now started with the other appreciable (in fact bigger) ‘minority’ who even run race based organizations like El Raza (the Race) – but this is their fundamental right, and one is not to identify it and alert rational people? I have not thrown dirt on GOP as ‘angry white men’, evil men have done so and encouraged by those who hate the good for being the good. It’s going on for very long time now – and one should not say anything in defense!


(The danger of white-American becoming Nazi is far less than he getting demoralized and losing the meaning of his system by attacks of Reverse Racism; their sense of life is very strongly individualistic. They may become Nazi if demoralization is not stopped – but to do so requires identification of who is doing it. There are people who agreed that the whole movement is going on to exactly crush the white American by demoralization. Ayn Rand’s views on racism are limited to a single, small article when the more prevalent danger and example were KKK and Nazi respectively. Moreover the same were views of the Anglo Saxons who freed them. BUT – even there she has reproached the “Negroes” as soon as she saw irrationality on their part. (Changing their label to Af-Ams was a minor part of encouraging their irrationality). Reverse Racism, which is showing its true colors now, is the bigger danger. I cannot read Ominous Parallels not being available to me, but that too seems to be of the same period. Today Lincoln’s view – yeah, the same man who emancipated them – is far more important, and to be considered in arriving at a solution – that the two races are so apart that they will not be harmonious, so should be separated. This applies to a large section of mankind – unless they don’t adopt individualism and practice it properly they become a danger to the more rational people. It also raises questions: what are the preconditions to emancipating others and to what extent is it proper to endanger a free country to take risks?


Just as men are good and bad, countries are good, bad, fanatic etc, so also communities are so because of their choices (culture / conscious or sub-conscious philosophy etc) and identifying it as example to less rational, and as precaution to more rational is not racism at all. They undergo demoralization, and require appreciation too (all of which requires identification of the phenomenon.) After having done so much good from which the world has benefited so much, to go on one way damning them, without the least recognition of their good, and to go on encouraging the irrational to destroy – there is hardly any evil on earth that can match this! The thesis of my book is that finally the emancipated people, who misuse their emancipation in a democracy, destroy that society – like the plebeians did to Rome mainly for the sake of doles, and which is what will happen in America. Leave alone 1-2 people here, even if most Americans do not accept it I will die with my theory – history will prove me right.


A comparison of incidences I have described in the book is as follows: In 2012 there was news about Mitt Romney talking about his ASP roots in Britain, special relationship etc, but the next minute he denied to save himself from the haters. (This relationship is far older but the phrnomenon of Reverse Racism against white man has come to fruition now – not one cannot talk about that relationship which Churchill, Thathcher etc emphasized so much!) In the 60-70s a man named Cassius Clay purposely changed himself to Islam to taunt white America because Africa is majorly Islamic. Even then there were cannibals like Idi Amin and many other Islamicists were developing; what Ali got is sympathy and appreciation while a large section of whites merely hung their head in shame. So Romney is a white racist if he talks about his roots – and they being encouraged as Af-Ams is their freedom! It is the haters of the good for being the good that have encouraged so much destruction of America that she is in her last leg of fall. So Obama inviting UN in America’s internal matters is his freedom; opposing him is only because he is black! Earlier I thought this was just cowardice – now I see full scale hatred of the good for being the good.


(Just a response of some basic points, I have not even re-read. My sub-article about the phenomenon is much longer. I no more see the need to spend too much time when men have such opinions and I will end this argument from my side.)


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:"Just a response of some basic points, I have not even re-read."

It's not clear what you are saying here, but what is clear is that you need to read what others have said - assuming you care. You keep confusing race with ideas and culture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites