Burgess Laughlin

Fraud exposed

7 posts in this topic

Fraud Exposed

Science works. In a free society, or usually even in a semi-free society, major errors and frauds aren't likely to survive undetected.

The linked article, on the BBC website, appears to be an early report and may be garbled. It is certainly jumbled in presentation. However, if its reports about the reactions of some South Korean advertisers are accurate, then this affair has revealed a flaw in South Korean culture -- placing "patriotism" above objectivity.

What is most intriguing to me is not the corruption revealed, but the fact that science -- the vast social network of scientists around the world -- is largely dedicated to objectivity. Another comfort is to see the positive effects that can come when debate and criticism are unrestricted -- thus placing pressure on sloppy or dishonest "scientists" to confess even before full disclosure.

Again, I note that this may be an early mass-media report and thus not as reliable as later reports will be. I look forward to finding out more about the situation and what it reveals -- good and bad -- about the state of Western (and semi-Western) culture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I look forward to finding out more about the situation and what it reveals -- good and bad -- about the state of Western (and semi-Western) culture.

Thank you, Mr. Laughlin, so do I. They don't say exactly what was wrong about the experiments/paper except that, "Mr Roh has said that a scientist working in Dr Hwang's laboratory was pressured into doctoring results to make the embryos look like clones" That doesn't say much about the research, but there'll probably be better coverage in science journals soon.

You're right, science can be such a refreshing field in this way, when the standard is the truth of reality. :D

~Aurelia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They don't say exactly what was wrong about the experiments/paper except that, "Mr Roh has said that a scientist working in Dr Hwang's laboratory was pressured into doctoring results to make the embryos look like clones"

Well, I can tell you this much: What has been called into question is the researchers' claim to have created embryonic stem cell lines that match the DNA of their patients. In several instances the DNA fingerprinting that purports to show the genetic match appears to be too perfect in their alignment, and in other cases the background noise appears to be very much the same. There are several different techniques that have been developed to perform DNA fingerprinting and the techniques introduce variables that rarely result in matches that exceed a certain probability. The best way to resolve the issue is to have the DNA fingerprinting redone by an expert in the field (there are many) who is not involved in this particular research.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was surprised by how much this incident has affected South Korea. I mean the stock markets have plummeted and the Prime Minister has called for an emergency meeting.

I can understand about the stock markets but the an emergency meeting by the Prime Minister??? Ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest news confirms earlier charges of fraud. If news reports are accurate, then I can see that plenty of people value objectivity. Of course, as this article indicates, there are a few supporters of the disgraced "scientist" who "want to believe."

The part that puzzles me is why this fraud took so long to emerge. Is it because most of the people involved saw only a part of the problem and therefore didn't raise questions or objections sooner? Or were they cowed by "authority" and afraid of losing their jobs? Or was there some other reason?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10636721/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it because most of the people involved saw only a part of the problem and therefore didn't raise questions or objections sooner? Or were they cowed by "authority" and afraid of losing their jobs? Or was there some other reason?

From what I have read in news reports, Hwang organized his lab like an industrial mass manufacturing shop with several small teams each specializing in a certain field in cloning. They worked separately and had little idea of the work the other team was doing. Thus it was easy to fabricate the results without the knowledge of other scientists working on this.

According to this (link) Washington Post article, bribery might also have played a role to a certain extent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The latest news confirms earlier charges of fraud. If news reports are accurate, then I can see that plenty of people value objectivity. Of course, as this article indicates, there are a few supporters of the disgraced "scientist" who "want to believe."

The part that puzzles me is why this fraud took so long to emerge. Is it because most of the people involved saw only a part of the problem and therefore didn't raise questions or objections sooner? Or were they cowed by "authority" and afraid of losing their jobs? Or was there some other reason?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10636721/

It is possible, though not typical, that Dr. Hwang's work is completely fraudulent. Though, in recent times, the single most circumstances involving scientific fraud is among scientists who think their work to be correct, and they then manipulate experimental data as a shortcut to what otherwise might require many years to properly demonstrate. Without a much more detailed investigation than that done by Dr. Hwang's university, it will be difficult to assess all of the factors involved. As damning as the current evidence appears, I caution against drawing too firm a conclusion.

For almost a decade I myself followed with great interest another notorious case of scientific fraud in the field of biology. The charges levelled, and the subsequent conviction of fraud made front-page news, but the eventual exoneration a decade later was naught but a back-page retraction. Casual sources reveal the worst, but truth and justice sometimes requires deeper investigation. Here is a short post I made to HBL about six years ago when charges of fraud were made on that forum against those whom I value and know to be innocent.

************************************************

Boy, did XXXXX pick the wrong case to justify his position!

Thereza Imanishi-Kari was a victim, and David Baltimore is a

hero! Baltimore fought a decade long battle in support of his

colleague because he knew she was innocent. He fought against the

exact kind of falsehoods which XXXXX repeats above.

Baltimore, a Nobel Prize winner, was the senior author of a paper

appearing in a 1986 issue of the journal _Cell_. Imanishi-Kari

was one of six coauthors, and it was a deceitful young scientist

in her lab who initially accused her of fraud. The government

performed a witch-hunt and the media sensationalized the story.

In June of 1996, a decade after publication--a decade where

careers were destroyed by ignorant people who abused their

investigative authority, destroyed by over-zealous bureaucrats

who manipulated the case--Imanishi-Kari was, finally, completely

exonerated on _all_ counts.

I admire David Baltimore's integrity and courage, and I am

saddened by the toll of injustice inflicted on Imanishi-Kari.

Yet, almost fifteen years later, they are here still being

treated to the same injustice. David Baltimore is now president

of Caltech, and I feel _privileged_ to have spoken with him

personally, and to have let him know how much I admire his

courage and will to fight for what is right.

Anyone interested in the facts of this fraudulent accusation of

fraud, and interested in learning about the wrath of those who do

not understand science, could do no better than to read Daniel

Kevles book, "The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science,

and Character", W. W. Norton and Company, 1998.

**********************************************

From the little I know Dr. Hwang does not appear to me to be of the caliber of a David Baltimore, and indeed he may be entirely guilty of complete fraud, but I have seen first-hand how influential a sensationalizing media can be to those investigators who are more beholding to politics than to truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites