Posted 11 May 2008 · Report post In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand wroteGold was an objective value,During Francisco's speech on money.But in The Virtue of Selfishness, she wrote that value"presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what?"Is this a contradiction?Is value subjective or objective? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 11 May 2008 · Report post Is this a contradiction?Is value subjective or objective?No contradiction. Value is objective.What "objective" means, though, is one of the more difficult ideas in Objectivism to understand. The best way I can think of to sum up what is meant by "objective" is: based on facts integrated by choice, for a purpose. That is a gross oversimplification, though. Dr. Peikoff's course Understanding Objectivism, gives the fullest coverage I know of. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 11 May 2008 · Report post I would also suggest to start by reading here:http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/objectiv...ryofvalues.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 11 May 2008 · Report post I think you're confusing objective and intrinsic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 11 May 2008 · Report post Ah, thank you.I took objective to mean independent of observation; I can see why the premise is flawed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites